Authority
Primary records, official guidance, and original research usually carry more weight than summaries that repeat them.
Where AI gets it wrong
One made-up detail.
A real-world consequence.
A citation that does not exist. A number from the wrong year. A route that closed this morning. See how AnswerCheck catches the detail that changes what you do next.
One repeatable method
From confident wordingto inspectable judgment.
AnswerCheck does not count links and call it truth. It tests whether the evidence is authoritative, current, independent, and capable of supporting the exact claim.
01
ISOLATE Claims
Separate checkable statements from the rest of the answer.02
RETRIEVE Evidence
Find relevant sources you can open and inspect yourself.03
COMPARE Signals
See support, conflict, and uncertainty without a false certainty score.Exact support
A real link is not enough. The source must support the exact number, population, date, unit, and conclusion in the answer.
Independence
Five articles repeating one press release are one underlying source—not five independent confirmations.
Freshness
For routes, rules, prices, products, and guidance, newer authoritative evidence can make an older answer unsafe.
Built for consequential questions
See what changesbefore you rely on it.
Each example follows the user’s real decision path: start with a plausible AI answer, compare the underlying sources, expose what the fluent wording concealed, and leave with a safer next step.
For a student, analyst, or researcher
“This study proves the intervention improves outcomes by 40%.”
What AnswerCheck surfaces
The cited paper exists—but the AI answer turns a limited association into a causal conclusion.
SELECTED AI CLAIM
“This study proves the intervention improves outcomes by 40%.”
Comparing independent sources
01DOI recordPaper and authors confirmeddoi.org ↗
02Original studySmall observational samplepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
03Systematic reviewEvidence remains inconclusivecochranelibrary.com ↗
WHY THIS SIGNAL
The original record confirms existence; the study defines scope; a later synthesis carries more weight on the broader conclusion.
REVIEW SIGNALConclusion needs context
For an investor, founder, or strategy team
“Company revenue grew 28% and its market share is now 17%.”
What AnswerCheck surfaces
The figures sound comparable, but they combine a fiscal-year result, company guidance, and an older market estimate.
SELECTED AI CLAIM
“Company revenue grew 28% and its market share is now 17%.”
Comparing independent sources
01Regulatory filingRevenue: +18% for FYsec.gov/edgar ↗
02Earnings release28% applies to one segmentcompany investor relations ↗
03Market dataset17% estimate is two years oldworldbank.org/data ↗
WHY THIS SIGNAL
A current regulatory filing is primary evidence. A segment-growth headline cannot replace the company-wide figure, and an older estimate loses weight.
REVIEW SIGNALA = 28% is not comparable; B = 18% is better supported
For someone checking a consequential answer
“This treatment is generally safe and recommended for adults.”
What AnswerCheck surfaces
The statement hides who was studied, dosage limits, contraindications, and whether guidance has changed.
SELECTED AI CLAIM
“This treatment is generally safe and recommended for adults.”
Comparing independent sources
01Public-health guidanceGeneral advice locatedwho.int ↗
02Clinical guidelineExceptions and monitoring notedguidelines.gov ↗
03Underlying studyPopulation does not match everyonepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
WHY THIS SIGNAL
Current public guidance and clinical scope outrank a generalized summary. Population, dosage, and contraindications must match the user’s question.
REVIEW SIGNALPopulation and safety context required
For a traveler making a same-day route decision
“Take the North Ridge trail tomorrow; it is open and should take about three hours.”
What AnswerCheck surfaces
The route recommendation relies on an evergreen guide and misses a weather-triggered closure posted by the local authority.
SELECTED AI CLAIM
“Take the North Ridge trail tomorrow; it is open and should take about three hours.”
Comparing independent sources
01Park authority alertTrail temporarily closed after rainnps.gov alerts ↗
02Local weather serviceHeavy rainfall warning remains activeweather.gov ↗
03Static travel guideNormal route details onlygeneral travel guide ↗
WHY THIS SIGNAL
A live authority alert and current weather warning outrank a static route guide when conditions change after publication.
REVIEW SIGNALRoute closed after rain · choose an alternative
For a founder, operator, or team working across markets
“This new disclosure rule applies to every company from January.”
What AnswerCheck surfaces
The answer merges a proposed rule, a final rule, and an implementation date that applies only to larger entities.
SELECTED AI CLAIM
“This new disclosure rule applies to every company from January.”
Comparing independent sources
01Regulator final ruleScope excludes smaller entitiesregulator final rule ↗
02Official implementation notePhased dates by company sizeofficial guidance ↗
03News summaryProposal described as finalsecondary coverage ↗
WHY THIS SIGNAL
A final regulator publication outranks commentary about a proposal. Jurisdiction, entity size, and phased effective dates decide whether the rule applies.
REVIEW SIGNALRule scope and effective date are narrower
For a writer, editor, or creator protecting credibility
“The report found 72% of workers are more productive with AI.”
What AnswerCheck surfaces
Multiple articles repeat the same number, but all trace back to a vendor survey with a narrower question and sample.
SELECTED AI CLAIM
“The report found 72% of workers are more productive with AI.”
Comparing independent sources
01Original survey72% refers to self-reported confidenceoriginal methodology ↗
02Methodology noteVendor-selected samplesurvey documentation ↗
03Independent reviewNo measured productivity resultindependent research ↗
WHY THIS SIGNAL
Repeated coverage is not independent confirmation when every article points to one survey. The original question and method define what the percentage can support.
REVIEW SIGNAL72% does not measure productivity
These are illustrative workflows. Links identify source types and authoritative starting points; they do not document a specific live claim. AnswerCheck is a review aid—not a substitute for primary-source review or qualified professional advice.
AI sounds right. AnswerCheck finds what it made up.
Mac + Chrome · $11.99/month · Cancel anytime